Logo Research Evaluation Essay Example

Logo Research Evaluation Essay It has only one colour which makes it easy recognisable.The style of the font is unique, and the C is curly, maybe symbolising the chocolate being stirred. Besides the word Cadbury there are two glasses with milk being poured out of them into what looks like a bowl of chocolate which is being mixed. This combination is very easily remembered. It has a green shape in the background which looks like a pair of glasses, and where they overlap at the middle its darker green. Across the middle of the shape it says Specsavers in a large informative font, and then Opticians in a smaller font underneath. The remaining parts of the word Specsavers are underlined. All the writing is in white which makes it stand out on the coloured background. This is easily recognisable because Specsavers is an opticians and when you see the glasses shape you automatically associate it with Specsavers. This logo has no text, just a picture. It is of two portraits, they are in 3D and are computer graphics. The front one is in a turquoise green colour, and the background one is in a lighter green. This logo is so easily recognisable, even without words, because it is so well known and easily remembered due to its simplicity. This logo is easily recognised because of its unique style. It is always presented in a bold italic font, and is often shown as white on a dark background colour. In this case its white outlined in black which makes the word stand out. It would probably be a more effective logo if it had an image with it. This logo is simple yet effective. Its a black circle on a square with a hot pink background. Inside the black circle is a heart with a pair of scissors sticking into it, in a simple white outline. Underneath the heart is the word scarling. in quite a plain, white font. The white on black on hot pink is a memorable combination of colo

Free Essays on Controversy Of 2008 Being, China Olympic Games

On July 13th 2001, China was chosen among several nations like Turkey, Japan, France and Canada to organize the Olympics. Whether or not China should have been granted this opportunity remains a sensitive issue for many. As for me, I totally agree with the selection of Beijing, China as the host city of the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Many believe that China should not have been awarded the games based on alleged civil rights abuses on the part of the Chinese communist government towards its own dissidents. In this paper, I will talk about all the allegations put towards China as to why they should not have been awarded the games and explain why I believe that the decision to give Beijing the games was the right one. The allegations are well deserved. Due to communism, the preoccupation of the Chinese authorities is to maintain social stability in order to keep the power. Nowadays in China there is no freedom of association, no free speech and no press freedom. Journalists are not able to do their job freely because they could be prosecuted and jailed if their work is judged "against the Party". The most important repression of free speech concerns the Internet users. More than fifteen persons are in jail for having expressed themselves on the web and people continue to be arrested and charged with serious offences for using the Internet to spread information about human rights or other politically sensitive issues. From what I have found in my research, the human rights situation in China is particularly present in Tibet and in Xinjiang, areas that are located in west China. In 1950 this region was invaded by the Chinese forces. In 1959 Tibetan people tried to force the Chinese out but the army repressed this movement violently and the Dalaà ¯-Lama left Tibet. Since 1959, Tibetan people and particularly religious, Buddhist monks and nuns, have been victims of Chinese repression. At the end of 2000, hundreds of Buddhist monks and nun... Free Essays on Controversy Of 2008 Being, China Olympic Games Free Essays on Controversy Of 2008 Being, China Olympic Games On July 13th 2001, China was chosen among several nations like Turkey, Japan, France and Canada to organize the Olympics. Whether or not China should have been granted this opportunity remains a sensitive issue for many. As for me, I totally agree with the selection of Beijing, China as the host city of the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Many believe that China should not have been awarded the games based on alleged civil rights abuses on the part of the Chinese communist government towards its own dissidents. In this paper, I will talk about all the allegations put towards China as to why they should not have been awarded the games and explain why I believe that the decision to give Beijing the games was the right one. The allegations are well deserved. Due to communism, the preoccupation of the Chinese authorities is to maintain social stability in order to keep the power. Nowadays in China there is no freedom of association, no free speech and no press freedom. Journalists are not able to do their job freely because they could be prosecuted and jailed if their work is judged "against the Party". The most important repression of free speech concerns the Internet users. More than fifteen persons are in jail for having expressed themselves on the web and people continue to be arrested and charged with serious offences for using the Internet to spread information about human rights or other politically sensitive issues. From what I have found in my research, the human rights situation in China is particularly present in Tibet and in Xinjiang, areas that are located in west China. In 1950 this region was invaded by the Chinese forces. In 1959 Tibetan people tried to force the Chinese out but the army repressed this movement violently and the Dalaà ¯-Lama left Tibet. Since 1959, Tibetan people and particularly religious, Buddhist monks and nuns, have been victims of Chinese repression. At the end of 2000, hundreds of Buddhist monks and nun...